Australia's highest court hears challenges to social media ban for children

The first challenge was brought by Sydney-based rights group Digital Freedom Project. They claim the law improperly robs millions of young Australians of a right to freedom of political communication implied in Australia’s constitution. The second challenge comes from U.S. online forum Reddit, which argues the ban raised issues of privacy and political expression.

Reddit also argued that it should not have included in the same category as other banned social media platforms. Teens removed as plaintiffs in a case. Two Sydney 15-year-olds, Noah Jones and Macy Neyland, had been included as plaintiffs when the Digital Freedom Project case was filed last year.

But the pair were removed over concerns they could be held liable for legal costs should the case fail. Noah Jones, who is now 16 and no longer subject to the ban, legislation amounted to a government step toward censorship.

“I believe that this is just a stepping stone further and further to censorship and I think they’ve masked it as this form of child safety,” Noah Jones said. “But in the end, it’s really just them trying to slowly gain more and more control of what young people see as they will be voters,” he added.

Noah’s mother, Renee Jones, “fiercely afraid” of problems social media presented to young people, but the government’s legislation missed the mark. She said the ban would leave young people ignorant about safe online interaction and the dangers that came with being on social media.

“I want my son to grow up into a young Australian man who is resilient, who is responsible online, who can identify the dangers, and who is able to vet some of these things,” the mother. Australian government plans to strengthen social media ban laws.

The government announced in June it was considering strengthening laws behind the ban. This followed evidence that young children were continuing to remain on social media. The 10 targeted platforms face fines of up to 49.5 million Australian dollars ($34.5 million) if they fail to take reasonable steps to remove the accounts of young children.

A study published in the British Medical Journal in June found 85% of a group of Australian 12- to 17-year-olds continued to use restricted platforms. The government’s own research released in March showed 7 in 10 underage children continued to hold accounts on Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and Tik.

Tok since December. Communications Minister Anika Wells was in court for the proceedings and later under attack. “We are here to defendant a fundamental tenet of Australian democracy which is an Australian’s right, and particularly an Australian child’s right, to be free from harm, and we seek to defendant that from sustained ideological attack,” Wells said.