|
    Theme
    National Verified Story

    Online shopping disputes fall under consumer courts: LHC

    Sheheryar Munawar•November 4, 2026• 2 min read
    Text Size
    Online shopping disputes fall under consumer courts: LHC
    National CoverageAman-e-Pakistan Digital Desk
    Key Story Executive Summary
    Quick Read

    “The Lahore High Court (LHC) has ruled that disputes arising from online shopping transactions, including the non-delivery of goods after full payment and subsequent cancellation of orders, fall within…”

    The court held that buyers cannot bypass the special legal forum by describing their claims for compensation as general damages, observing that jurisdiction must be determined by the cause of action rather than the terminology or amount of relief sought.

    Justice Malik Waqar Haider Awan made these observations while dismissing a constitutional petition filed by Dr Muhammad Ahtisham Qamar, who had challenged a civil court's decision to return his damages suit and the subsequent dismissal of his appeal by an additional district judge.

    The petitioner had sought recovery of Rs2,116,480 in refund and damages over an online purchase of two clothing articles worth Rs6,480., he had paid the full amount through his credit card, but the articles were not delivered within the stipulated period. Instead, the sellers cancelled the order after 17 days, citing the Covid-19 pandemic.

    Key Story Takeaway

    "Stay connected with Aman-e-Pakistan for ongoing live reporting and verified investigative updates."

    Although the amount was subsequently refunded, he sought compensation for alleged mental agony, humiliation and other losses. The defendants initially denied the online transaction but later admitted that a booking had been made, the stock was unavailable and the amount received had been refunded.

    The civil court returned the plaint under Order VII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, directing the petitioner to approach the competent forum under the Punjab Consumer Protection Act 2005. The appellate court upheld the decision, prompting him to move the high court.

    The petitioner's counsel argued that the claim was primarily for general damages arising from mental distress and humiliation caused by the cancellation of the transaction.

    S

    Written by Sheheryar Munawar

    Aman-e-Pakistan Senior Journalist & Bureau Reporter

    Fact Checked & Verified

    Continue Reading: More in National

    Swipe or click arrows to explore National desk coverage

    AJK PM reviews law and order situation during Rawalakot visitNational

    AJK PM reviews law and order situation during Rawalakot visit

    Read Story
    Only 39 candidates file nomination papers for Islamabad local government electionsNational

    Only 39 candidates file nomination papers for Islamabad local government elections

    Read Story
    North Korean leader calls for 'rapid' naval build up as Pyongyang warns of stronger response to US 'hostility'National

    North Korean leader calls for 'rapid' naval build up as Pyongyang warns of stronger response to US 'hostility'

    Read Story
    Children's theatre dominates World Culture Festival 2026National

    Children's theatre dominates World Culture Festival 2026

    Read Story
    I don't walk away from a dare, says Ali Zafar of 'Gangs of Khorasan' roleNational

    I don't walk away from a dare, says Ali Zafar of 'Gangs of Khorasan' role

    Read Story
    FCC sets six principles for criminal background checks in government recruitmentNational

    FCC sets six principles for criminal background checks in government recruitment

    Read Story