|
    Theme
    Business Verified Story

    Mir Raz murder case: Ahmed's lawyer questions commission's treatment of witness

    Fawad KhanSeptember 4, 2026 2 min read
    Text Size
    Mir Raz murder case: Ahmed's lawyer questions commission's treatment of witness
    Business CoverageAman-e-Pakistan Digital Desk
    Key Story Executive Summary
    Quick Read

    Khalid Mumtaz, the counsel for Mir Raza’s business partner Ahmed and vendor Abdullah, has questioned the manner in which the commission questioned his client, saying he appeared as a witness rather th…

    Speaking to the media, Mumtaz said the commission was questioning Ahmed in a manner that made him feel as though he were an accused, despite his appearance as a witness. He said Mir Raza had travelled to Islamabad once or twice previously, but Ahmed had not taken the matter seriously at the time.

    More than a month later, he said, Ahmed had still not reopened his shop., Mir Raza’s father had gone to Bahadurabad and asked employees to reopen the shop, but they refused, leaving him angry. Mumtaz said they would comment on the matter after the commission issued its findings.

    More to read: Sindh High Court rejects plea for JIT in Mir Raza case. He said Mir Raza had been repaying a loan of Rs45 million taken by his father, describing it as a family matter that he did not wish to discuss.

    Key Story Takeaway

    "Stay connected with Aman-e-Pakistan for ongoing live reporting and verified investigative updates."

    Mumtaz said Ahmed had also attended Mir Raza’s Soyem and claimed that there was nothing against him. He added that the case had become highly prominent in the media. The lawyer further claimed that investigators had also sought Mir Raza’s father’s phone, but he did not provide it.

    He questioned why Mir Raza’s father had not contacted his son from July 29 to 31. Mumtaz also said Mir Raza had earlier that his father had made “another mistake.” He added that Ahmed had gone somewhere but was later reprimanded by his mother, saying all details would be disclosed at an appropriate time.

    Meanwhile, Ahmed had been cooperating with the investigation from the outset and would continue to speak about the truth and facts. He said a business could not simply be wrapped up with Rs500,000 to Rs600,000 and claimed he had remained under investigation since July 30.

    Ahmed added that investigations also had established procedures that needed to be followed.

    F

    Written by Fawad Khan

    Aman-e-Pakistan Senior Journalist & Bureau Reporter

    Fact Checked & Verified

    Continue Reading: More in Business

    Swipe or click arrows to explore Business desk coverage

    Pakistan stock exchange remains volatile during tradingBusiness

    Pakistan stock exchange remains volatile during trading

    Read Story
    High costs squeeze Pakistan's exportsBusiness

    High costs squeeze Pakistan's exports

    Read Story
    PM approves Trade Facilitation BoardBusiness

    PM approves Trade Facilitation Board

    Read Story
    Need to regulate unhealthy foodsBusiness

    Need to regulate unhealthy foods

    Read Story
    Yen headed for strongest week in a month, dollar flat ahead of payroll dataBusiness

    Yen headed for strongest week in a month, dollar flat ahead of payroll data

    Read Story
    iPhone 18 Pro and foldable iPhone Ultra prices leak ahead of launchBusiness

    i. Phone 18 Pro and foldable i. Phone Ultra prices leak ahead of launch

    Read Story